Your comment is mentioned in a recent video that I was watching. I remembered reading the hackernews thread but oh man it felt so joyful seeing your comment on the video and I was surprised/amazed so much so that I have come here.
I wonder how you feel about it? Did you know about this video and I'd be curious to hear your response about it :-D
It made me realize that people might actually be scouring through the internet and the hackernews comments that we write along the way might even be showed by people to perhaps an even larger audience. Wow.
Here's my attempt[0] (5 months ago) on trying to keep track of all the things that AI had negatively done yet we were forgetting back then. Looking back, I definitely need to update it as so much has happened since then but that is my point, I wish if you could go back and see all the negative things that we most likely forgot AI companies have done. They are just continuously overdoing things and constantly tiring us and having us not keep track of all the things of our past and the process repeats.
GDP is a particularly poor proxy to measure all of this. AI/Datacenters can increase the GDP while the costs (energy,infra, labor,disruption,capital concentration) are distributed elsewhere
It reminds me of the old joke where two economies each eat a dead rat for 10k$ and conclude they just added 20k$ to the GDP/Economy.
I wish to ask if its that AI is increasing our actual economic output but also who really captures the gains and who bears the costs if the boom eventually reverses.
[0]: I was going to write this comment manually but pasted this comment from @ChrisArchitect from: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49511568 (Thanks Chris, I appreciate you writing these comments and have a nice day!)
I think hyperinflation makes the system unpredictable and having a child inadvertently requires long-term planning, which becomes fuzzy in such an environment.
Having a child is such a large, substantial commitment which would probably be best made in a really predictable environment.
It is true that in the past, unpredictable environments didn't completely stop people from having children, but there are just so many factors (social media, contraception, job-related stress, social acceptance of not having children) and many more which create the combined net effect.
I wouldn't say that inflation plays the absolute key component, but certainly it's a discussion worth having.
Also, even if some objective measures of living standards are improving, we are constantly bombarded with information about wars, economic crises, political instability, climate change, etc., and it takes a toll psychologically, which perhaps comes into consideration when discussing having a child.
Constantly seeing evidence of this uncertainty could affect the perception of how predictable the future is, which might matter when making a 20+ year commitment like having children.
Interesting to note that mimo v2.6 pro has been released at I think 1 trillion parameters and does mostly better or equal than grok 4.7 which is a 2 trillion parameter. Both of which got released on the same day.
That’s a factor of half the parameters. I would be curious to see more on the focus of smaller parameters model and pushing its frontiers
For me it seems like this model’s overthinking should be tamed.
Perhaps instead of giving it a one shot task with vague prompt. I wonder how it can perform with much more detailed and constrained prompt (can you please elaborate more on the level of detailness and ambiguity that the prompt is and where does this model seem to overthink the most?)
Also are there any ways to tame such overthinking of models in general?
I hope that once models start becoming smart enough (I think for me it’s already there) or becoming genuinely the Sota. They then start focusing a lot more on optimizing token usage
Interesting, I would also like to see this curation not just in factor of interests, but also disinterest.
For example, suppose someone doesn't want to read about AI. Instead of blanket banning words or having custom ublock origin scripts (which is what people are doing nowadays), it could ironically use AI (jev) to do that perhaps more robustly.
I think that this is an interesting idea though.
In theory, I would also like to see something which can get the gist of my account (and then find out all the things that I like for example) which could then give the keywords for the curation. This way I wouldn't have to enter the amount of keywords as well.
Really interesting and meta project for hackernews, starred :-D
I started this with the intention to run it as a daemon on my homelab server and send the interesting stories to me on WhatsApp, which is why it is filtered based on interests only.
Oh okay, yea this is a good use case too but for me, viewing hackernews is best from the browser (though I guess sometimes I am reading hackernews too much haha) but I certainly get the appeal of what you are doing. Good luck with the project!
Let me add a few more layers just for some fun and profit :-D
Here[0] is an archive.org page which archives an archive.is page which archives the original article about internet censorship of an archive site that might require an archive of an archive site to read (given that people of spain cant now view archive.is in the first place or might have some difficulties doing so)
> "Temporarily Offline Internet Archive services are temporarily offline. " What did you DO
It seems that all of internet archive was down and I don't think that it was because of me (I hope), maybe just some other issues and some sort of just a chance that internet archive got offline at the exact same time that I had shared this thing here.
but when I had opened up hackernews and I read your comment, I genuinely felt myself also as what did I DO.
It is back again now for what its worth, whew what a relief but folks please remember to donate to internet archive for its posterity :-)
Thanks, I will try to look more into this. I think it might be related to number of connections of piping servers but I am a little perplexed about it on how this is possible on an archived link.
Can you please tell me more details so that I can hopefully try to fix it in the future. Did you try to open up the archive.org link of the website or the website itself (which is just a gh page: https://serjaimelannister.github.io/htmlpipe/?https://ppng.i...)
I would like to know more so that I can hopefully fix that for the future, have a nice day :-D
Been using the archive page firefox extension for a year or two. Yet now it looks like a total war against this resource was waged and it's no longer a good resource for archiving.
archive.is is the best substitute. For some reason people here won't accept that. They think the internet is still a calm cooperative place like the olden days.
My office's "net nanny" blocks archive.is as a "Russian site". However, archive.ph (use the same link across all the various sites) is not blocked (yet).
For me, archive.today, archive.is, archive.md, archive.ph, etc. are _not reliable_ for a number of reasons
But some archive.today users who comment on HN cannot seem to accept that archive.today may not work for everybody else
NB. Archive.today is not a "substitute for archive.org". Archive.today does not do www crawls
As for archive.org, I know of a number of alternatives but each is generally less reliable and/or less comprehensive than archive.org
Comman Crawl, i.e., downloads from data.commoncrawl.org, is reasonably reliable but not as comprehensive as archive.org. CC is not a reasonable substitute for archive.org's CDX service. The CC CDX endpoint, index.commoncrawl.org, historically has been easily overwhelmed and unreliable
As for archive.today alternatives (no crawls, only user-submitted URLs), ghostarchive.org seems well-designed but not used much. No CAPTCHA, HTTPS and Javascript are optional and HAR files are provided. Whether it gets blocked like archive.today sites I do not know
NB. Archive.today users may be using archive.today not as an archive but as a lazy man's solution for "paywalls" (Javascript annoyances)
Where that's the case, comparsions to archive.org or other archives that are derived from crawls are inappropriate
I wonder how you feel about it? Did you know about this video and I'd be curious to hear your response about it :-D
It made me realize that people might actually be scouring through the internet and the hackernews comments that we write along the way might even be showed by people to perhaps an even larger audience. Wow.
[0]: I Found the BANNED Chapter of "How To Win Friends and Influence People": [https://youtu.be/iGJ0W8s1ka0?t=281](https://youtu.be/iGJ0W8s1ka0?t=281)
reply