Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | biesnecker's commentslogin

I came here to say this, like... wow. I'm pretty sure at at least a few of the places I've worked that would be grounds for immediate termination.


They probably should have added the disclaimer: opinions are my own..


Yeah that isn't a magic get-out clause. I don't think I would have been immediately fired for this from anywhere I work at, but that's partly because I live in the UK.

Every company I've worked at has said very clearly not to comment about work things on social media. I would definitely have been in serious trouble for this. I imagine some strongly worded emails from marketing are flying around OpenAI right now.


This is the stupidest disclaimer: it's completely unnecessary. Of course the opinions are their own! Whose else would they be? Your mum's?

If someone was speaking on behalf of their employer, they would've used the official channels (such as I dunno an `openai` HN handle, or whatever other channel).

I'm outraged that people think this "opinions are my own" disclaimer is ever necessary.


I am sure that will assuage the legal dept. /s


It seems exceedingly unlikely that the current Pro plan costs will hold for the next two years. The subsidization train is going to end eventually.


Is the assumption here that inference costs will stay roughly static, or that frontier models will keep getting more expensive quickly enough to offset efficiency gains?

Because I don’t think “the subsidization train is going to end” necessarily means current pricing becomes impossible.

If capital keeps pouring into frontier AI, companies still have an incentive to subsidize access while competing for users and market share. And if that subsidization starts drying up, there’s even more incentive to bring inference costs down by making smaller and cheaper models catch up to today’s frontier capabilities.

So either way, I’m not sure you can extrapolate from the cost of serving current frontier models to what equivalent capability will cost two years from now.


Engaged != listened to.


It had a very 90s/early-2000s tech blog feel to it. Only thing missing was his custom Gentoo build.


I found it delightful. It added character and created a sense of relatability from the outset.


you are visitor 18813!


Good riddance.


$10k is such an insanely small amount of money (compared to SWE salaries) for someone at a big tech company to risk their job for.


This was the first example that popped to mind: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs...

Not having Google accounts isn't the end of the world, but given the amount that many (most?) of us rely on their services (I think of all the accounts I have tied to my @gmail email and cringe, but still I'm there), this is fairly disasterous.


This. People tend not to realize how sprawling enterprise software stacks tend to be, how many implicit dependencies have to be untangled, etc. Even simple things can take years and complicated things often just don’t get done at all.


Yes, dealing with the mess that is your software stack, the mess that is your corporate structure, and the mess that is your change management process means that things a couple dudes in your startup could accomplish in a week would take a year at a crusty enterprise.


All my feedback has been covered by others, so just +1 on “this is awesome, he (and you) should be proud!” Looking forward to seeing his internship projects in a decade or so.


I don’t click on HN articles expecting to cry, but here we are.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: