lets say you have page=0 some of these pages are public and some are private, and the only way you secure the private pages is to not link it on the website.

is incrementing a url query parameters from 0 -> 1 count as hacking?

You don’t that’s a python f string

name = “qurren” print(f”hello {name}”)

I use cursor and claude, its kinda annoying having to have the same skills in both so I made a ~/.agents/skills folder then ln both cursor and claude skills to point to that folder.

which works except that claude uses .skills/synced which is uses to sync changes to skills from claude servers into the skills folder.

every other agent I have used just directly syncs into .skills so it ends up duplicating skills

does /goal also have time/token limits?

Only when my usage runs out

Not as far as I can tell, when I've been using it.

Compared to the deep seek, gml sure but compared to OpenAI and Anthropic it’s actually very cheap.

In cursor I have switch over to grok for planning a composer for coding.

Maybe mid priced is a better term for it lol.

Sure I can accept that lol

I’m not sure either would is particularly good at describing what is happening.

Error in implies something broke, which nothing broke the LLM did exactly what they where designed to do generate text based on a statistically likely bases.

Hallucination Does really fit here either. It implies it’s experiencing something that is not there which it isn’t experiencing anything.

Unexpected Result is perhaps a more accurate description.

Howabout: lied. The LLM lied indirectly (perhaps) but it made a claim that was false. Which is a lie.

Humans lie and LLMs “hallucinate”? What gives. It’s an untruth that the LLM is selling for a truth, that’s lying in my books.

And since we don’t know how or why the LLM works, we can’t even judge whether it explicitly lied or only because it didn’t know better.

Lie implies it knows what it is saying to be false.

I have never understood why instead Adding “never edit test files” to a prompt we don’t simple sandbox these agents so that’s just never an option.

Because that means you won't get free PR from having your models run out of control.

Won’t the companies just change what they are selling from access to the model to “compute” and then not technically be breaking the law?

That was interesting other than the golden orb weaver, all the other spider species noted as edible are tarantula.

I assume because of their size relative to other species?

This does feel like anthropic are worried about other companies and how fast they are moving, concerned they won’t be able to keep up.