Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | whiplash451's commentslogin

As an engineer, I can relate but also found a workaround in deciding what kind of interactions I wanted to have with an LLM. As a coding agent? Yes. As an advisor for life decisions? No. And then there's a lot of in-between where I decide to use an LLM or not based on whether I will dislike the tone.

OpenAI and Anthropic are so close on benchmarks and release date that they are essentially ex-aequo at this point. The market is just hedging their bets.

There is no close second, because the AA Index points are expentially harder to get as you get closer to the first.


There’s quite a few companies in that field already. Keen to hear their feedback if they are reading this.

Is there evidence that small models hallucinate less than big ones?


Groundbreaking includes the “explain to the world why it matters” part


Well I surely hope so. That’s the whole point of fine tuning.


Why inefficient? If Claude continuously makes the system more efficient based on demand, there's no reason for the system to be less efficient than if it was managed by humans.


I believe they mean Claude does the work directly, rather than writing software to do it.


  If Claude continuously makes the system more efficient based on demand
Yes, Claude, please make the system as efficient as possible. Make no mistakes


I am with you and wish you were right, but good luck forcing Meta to change the key dark design patterns of their products (correctly identified by the regulators as "highly personalised recommendations, autoplay and infinite scroll")

This is a step in the right direction, though. It will be a long journey.


> good luck forcing Meta

When I was a kid there were fines for factories that polluted water. Most of the time they were not found out, and when they did they just paid the fine that it was cheaper than to solve the problem.

Regulations changed, factories that polluted water got closed until they fixed the problem. Most factory owners fear the regulation, they are extremely pro-active to avoid breaking the law because the consequences are not worth it. (This trend reversed a decade ago when punishments started to be less harsh and government became more pro-business using the euphemism for corrupt)

It is possible to reign in Meta. Parents should be angry enough to bring governments down for letting tech treat their children as products. When citizens are angry change happens and becomes unavoidable.


Exactly. If social media apps had a configurable old style non-algorithmic feed the problem would be dramatically smaller.


With FBPurity: https://www.fbpurity.com/ I have Facebook on my desktop computer exactly as it used to be in the 2000s when I signed up: content only from my "friends" and a few chosen sources (a band I like etc).

The newsfeed is very slow to load, as to fill the screen the extension must make twenty plus requests while hiding 99% of what Facebook's addiction machine returns.


People prefer the more engaging option, based on testing when preferences are offered.

You aren’t really putting a fair choice here. A product that is tested and refined to be viscerally attractive to our brains, vs will power.

This means you have the illusion of individual choice, with practical addiction at scale.


> highly personalised recommendations, autoplay and infinite scroll

Didn't tiktok get hit with this earlier in the year? Has tiktok removed these features for European users?


You pay your taxes to Lightspeed?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: