Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You should always assume your competitors are negotiating for the best deal on things and so should you.

Being passive and simply accepting things at face value is not competitive or smart.



Yeah, I am sure that if I tomorrow start with my 0 customers google will give me the same treatment as spotify.


Why should they?


They should or they shouldn’t.

The issue is the right to know as a competitor or potential competitor isn’t it? These aren’t deals between two companies, they are terms for public marketplaces, and that is a critical difference.


To limit the power of monopolies.

https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/index_en


> Being a passive and simply accepting things at face value is not competitive or smart.

The parent comment did not suggest doing anything of the kind, and what should a spotify competitor do in this instance anyway?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: