Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OpenRouter’s “moat” is currently “why would I use anything else?”.

Stripe has presumably only purchased them because they think there’s consumer-surplus to monetize here, which presumably will soon be giving me lots of reasons to use something else.



It isn't clear to me what advantages OpenRouter has over running a similar router-aggregator locally for ~free. I guess they have stronger bargaining power than a solo engineer or small startup, and can therefore negotiate volume discounts with model providers. The question is if those discounts let them offer cheaper rates than a local router-aggregator even after the markup. And if they can do that, then OpenRouter is undercutting the providers themselves on price, which I would imagine the providers would not want to see.


Because the others are cheaper


Which other aggregators that have anywhere near the model selection are cheaper?


The others have to charge a payment processing fee and take some profits.


OpenCode Go is too good to be true, and I suspect it won't last, like GitHub Copilot.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: