> And all the "little people" whose land value is negatively impacted? They don't count?
I don't see where I said this. I'm not even sure what you're arguing with me over.
The point is pretty clear, I think. It has more to do with this individual's greed and probably very little (if any) to do with environmental concerns.
At least this "big guy" can afford to live somewhere else.
Imagine having the environmental concerns, and not being able to sell and get away from them.